Survey ranks Las Vegas best place to buy home

BY HUBBLE SMITH
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

Posted: Aug. 17, 2011 | 1:59 a.m.

With prices at 20-year lows, Las Vegas ranks as the best city in the country to buy a home instead of renting, a survey by San Francisco-based Trulia.com real estate listing service shows.

Home ownership beats renting in 74 percent of 50 major U.S. cities included in Trulia's Summer 2011 Rent vs. Buy Index, which compares the cost of buying and renting a two-bedroom apartment, condo or townhouse.

Joining Las Vegas in the top five cities are Detroit; Mesa, Ariz.; Fresno, Calif.; and Arlington, Texas.

Las Vegas came in with a price-to-rent ratio of 6, based on Trulia's median list price of $58,000 divided by $9,700 for 12 months of rent, or about $800 a month.

"It wasn't too much of a surprise, especially when we look at the foreclosure rate and the unemployment rate so high," Trulia spokeswoman Daisy Kong said Tuesday. "What's interesting is Las Vegas has been pretty consistently at 6 the last three times we looked at the numbers since January, whereas other places like Miami we saw rise from 6 to 13."

It's still less expensive to buy in Miami, but the rent-to-buy ratio increased 112 percent as foreign investors and a freeze on foreclosures have created a "mini-buying boom," Kong said.

About half of Las Vegas home sales are cash-only transactions, and many involve foreign investors, she said.

"We look at international buyers, and I know Canada and China are the top countries looking at Las Vegas on our site," Kong said.

Las Vegas has always been a great city to buy vs. rent, though the pendulum swung the other way when home prices skyrocketed, said Realtor Tim Kelly Kiernan of ReMax Extreme. He said he now has an older single-family home in escrow for $35,000, or about a $320 monthly mortgage payment, with a VA-backed loan.

"If you can qualify for a mortgage, it makes sense to buy if you can," Kiernan said. "You can get an FHA with 3½ percent down; you buy a condo for $40,000, $50,000, $60,000, your payment would be ridiculously low. The whole thing is the creditworthiness of buyers."

Some banks are making loans for $30,000 to $40,000, something they would not have done in the past, Kiernan said.

Housing analyst Larry Murphy of Las Vegas-based SalesTraq agrees that Las Vegas real estate prices have over-corrected and are undervalued. He used an example of buying a home for $100,000, renting it out for $900 a month and getting return on investment of almost 11 percent.

"Homes in Las Vegas are a bargain by any criteria you want to apply -- comparative price approach to other cities, cost to replicate, investment approach," Murphy said. "That's why we're selling 50,000-plus resale homes each of the past two years. The only problem is, you need cash to be a buyer in this market because of high unemployment and lenders who don't really want to lend."

While Standard and Poor's credit downgrade of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has shaken consumer confidence in the housing market, it hasn't destroyed the dream of home ownership, Trulia spokesman Ken Shuman said.

However, homebuyers who are ready and qualified to buy face an uphill battle with lending, he said.

"Today's record-low mortgage rates have actually made banks less enthusiastic about approving residential mortgage applications," he said. "Until a middle ground on lending practices can be met, many highly qualified buyers may be forced to be renters for now."

A lot of prospective homebuyers are "on the fence" about renting or buying in today's market, Kong said.

Should they take advantage of falling home prices and low mortgage rates, or should they continue to rent until the economy stabilizes?

"Price alone should never be the sole factor in deciding to purchase a home," Kong said. "Instead, buyers should first ask themselves if they plan to live in the home for at least seven to 10 years, can make monthly payments on the house and have enough cash in the bank for a down payment and an additional six to eight months worth of mortgage payments."

If so, then the cost of buying a home definitely outweighs renting, she said.

In cities with a price-to-rent ratio of 21 or greater, the cost of home ownership is much greater than renting.

The five cities where it's clearly better to rent than buy are New York; Fort Worth, Texas; Omaha, Neb.; Seattle; and San Francisco.

Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491.

What is Deed In Lieu?

The Obama administration blessed the proposed extension of the $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers on Thursday 10/29/09 as the Senate neared a compromise that would extend the credit to more potential buyers.

Here’s a primer on who might be able to get the expanded credit, and what it might do for the housing market:

Who gets the credit, and how much can they claim? First-time home buyers are eligible for up to $8,000 on the tax credit, which is the same as the current credit. The Senate version of the bill creates a new credit of up to $6,500 for homeowners who have lived in their homes for five years. That provision would start on Dec. 1.

How long will it last? The tax credits would expire on April 30, 2010, but home buyers under contract by April 30 would be able to qualify as long as they complete the sale within 60 days. Keep in mind, this would be the third iteration of a home buyer tax credit that has been in place since mid-2008. Sen. Johnny Isakson, the Georgia Republican who has been a staunch advocate of the credit, promised that this would be the “last extension” of the credit, according to Dow Jones Newswires’ Corey Boles. “Tax credits like this only work by creating the sense of urgency to take advantage of it,” Sen. Isakson said.

Will the tax credit do anything for the high-end of the market? Probably not. The tax credit phases out for home buyers with incomes above $125,000 for single filers and $225,000 for married couples. Also, homes that cost more than $800,000 aren’t eligible for the credit. Overall, the tax credit is likely to generate only a modest further increase in home sales, says Tom Lawler, an independent economist in Leesburg, Va.  For many well-paid people, he says, it won’t make a big difference: “A household earning around $150,000 is likely to buy a home of $500,000 plus, so a $6,500 credit won’t be much of a factor in pushing such households off the fence.”

What other limits does the credit have? Toddlers are out of luck. Last week’s congressional hearings spotlighted concerns about misuse of the credit, including some 500 tax filers under age 18 who had claimed the credit.

So will the expanded tax credit help sales? That’s a point of debate among housing analysts and economists. Alec Phillips, economist at Goldman Sachs, notes that expanding the credit to people who already own homes doesn’t necessarily make a big dent in the supply of housing on the market. “If these ‘step-up’ buyers already own a home and sell it to finance the new one, that hasn’t reduced the amount of inventory for sale,” he says.

But Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, thinks the extension is a big deal. Based on a preliminary analysis, he said it should mean at least 500,000 in additional sales, atop the 400,000 he estimates already have been generated by the tax credits (twice the Goldman estimate). “The tax credit is not a very efficient tax cut, but not extending it would do significant damage to the still fragile housing market,” Mr. Zandi said.

For the week of May 18, 2009 --- Vol. 7, Issue 20

Last Week in Review

"I WILL ACT NOW. I WILL ACT NOW. I WILL ACT NOW." Og Mandino. The markets took those words to heart last week, with plenty of timely action ranging from telling economic reports to interesting announcements from the government, related to homebuyers.

On the economic news front, the headlines were mixed. On the disappointing side was a worse than expected Retail Sales Report, which showed that consumers are continuing to tighten their purse strings. Not entirely surprising, but it did mark the eighth decline in the past ten months for Retail Sales. Initial Unemployment Claims were also reported worse than expected - which some said were due to massive Chrysler layoffs - but still was disappointing after there had been some recent signs of improvement in the labor markets.

However, there was positive economic news as well, including improved readings from the manufacturing sector, as the New York Empire State Manufacturing Index improved for the third month straight. Consumer Sentiment was also better than the previous reading and the best since September of last year. So although the consumer isn't out spending money with abandon just yet, this report shows that most folks are indeed starting to feel better about the economic outlook, likely due in part to the values of their investment accounts improving as Stock values move higher.

Looking at the always-important inflation headlines, wholesale inflation levels moved higher in April, driven by an increase in food prices. On the consumer inflation side, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) report was flat, although the Core CPI - which removes food and energy prices - was a little hotter than expected, largely due to a huge spike in tobacco prices by a smoking 9.3%! Core inflation has been moving slightly higher since February, as you can see in the chart below.

Chart: Core Consumer Price Index

Remember, inflation is the archenemy of Bonds and home loan rates, so I will be keeping a close eye on this in the coming months.

And as if that all weren't enough, the government got in on the action, with the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Federal Housing Administration making a very interesting announcement that ultimately appeared to be slightly premature. They announced a new plan to allow first-time homebuyers to use the Federal tax credit of up to $8,000 for a down payment at closing, rather than making buyers wait to receive the benefit after the fact at tax time. However, no details or logistics of how this will actually work were released, causing them to actually pull some of the industry announcements as they regroup to provide more details. This could be great news for first-time homebuyers, who are slated to account for 53% of home purchases in 2009. When the details of the program are fully released, I will certainly keep you posted as I learn more.

Bonds and home loan rates were able to make some improvements in the early part of the week as weak economic reports caused money to flow from Stocks into Bonds. And while Bonds lost some ground on Friday, home loan rates still ended the week slightly improved from where they began.

NOW IS THE PERFECT TIME TO TAKE SOME ACTION IN GETTING YOUR HOME READY FOR SUMMER. CHECK OUT THIS WEEK'S MORTGAGE MARKET VIEW FOR SOME GREAT TIPS AND IDEAS.

Forecast for the Week

The week ahead is sure to be just as action packed as the last, including a read on the housing market via Tuesday's Housing Starts and Building Permits report. And given last week's worse than expected Initial Unemployment Claims report, this Thursday's updated number will be one to keep an eye on.

Thursday also brings more news from the manufacturing sector with the Philadelphia Fed Report. This monthly survey of manufacturing purchasing managers conducting business around the tri-state area of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware is one of the most-watched manufacturing reports overall. And given the good news from last week's New York Empire State Manufacturing Report, it will be interesting to see what the Philadelphia Fed Report reveals.

Remember: Weak economic news normally causes money to flow out of the Stock market and into the Bond market, helping Bonds and home loan rates improve...while positive and strong economic news normally has the opposite result. As you can see in the chart below, Bonds and home loan rates made some improvements last week, so I will be watching closely to see if this direction continues in the coming week. If you have questions as to how current historically low interest rates might benefit you, or someone you know, please feel free to send me an email or give me a call - my contact information is right at the top of this newsletter.

Chart: Fannie Mae 4.0% Mortgage Bond (Friday May 15, 2009)

The Mortgage Market View...

"Summerize" Your Home with These Spring Projects
It's hard to believe, but the official start of summer is just a few weeks away! Here are some spring cleaning projects you should definitely consider tackling before the hottest days of summer descend upon us.

Air Conditioning
It's important to have your air conditioner in perfect working order before summer starts. Taking care of any issues after the summer heat hits can potentially result in an increase in price, as well as an increase in the time it takes for a technician to visit your home. You should also replace any filters now. Simply remove the old one and take it to your local home improvement center. Sales representatives should have no problem finding its replacement.

Clean out your garage
Organizing a garage can be an excruciating experience during the hot summer months, so if that's something you need to do, don't put it off any longer. Once you clean out your garage, either donate any unwanted items or sell them.

Paint
Late spring is the perfect time to paint the interior of your home since the weather best lends itself to keeping your windows open, allowing the fresh air in and the paint fumes out. If you decide to paint the inside of your home, think about lightening the existing color as opposed to darkening it. Lighter colors are not only inviting, they create the illusion of a bigger, more open space.

Buy fans
Installing ceiling fans and using portable fans are great methods for cutting the heat inside your home. They are also far less expensive to use than an air conditioner. Using fans of any kind also enables you to keep windows open at night, allowing fresh air to circulate throughout the house.

Install dimmer switches
Dimmer switches not only add ambience, they also cut down on energy and the unwanted heat given off by brighter bulbs. Another tip is to use low-wattage light bulbs whenever possible.

Good luck and happy "summerizing!"

The Week's Economic Indicator Calendar

Remember, as a general rule, weaker than expected economic data is good for rates, while positive data causes rates to rise.

Economic Calendar for the Week of May 18 - May 22

The material contained in this newsletter is provided by a third party to real estate, financial services and other professionals only for their use and the use of their clients. The material provided is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment and/or mortgage advice. Although the material is deemed to be accurate and reliable, we do not make any representations as to its accuracy or completeness and as a result, there is no guarantee it is not without errors.

Mortgage Success Source, LLC is the copyright owner or licensee of the content and/or information in this email, unless otherwise indicated.   Mortgage Success Source, LLC does not grant to you a license to any content, features or materials in this email.   You may not distribute, download, or save a copy of any of the content or screens except as otherwise provided in our Terms and Conditions of Membership, for any purpose.

Follow Shirley Brass on Twitter!  You can follow RealtorLasVegas for Tweets on all the latest Real Estate news in the Las Vegas & Henderson areas!

‘Mark-to-Market’ Mortgages Could Save Las Vegas’s Home Market:

U.S. President Barack Obama’s $75 billion plan to help families avoid foreclosure should be bolder.  While it is a meaningful rescue attempt that may help 9 million Americans, it could be doomed unless mortgage issuers have to write down principal to reflect current market values. The odious (to lenders) concept of a “mark-to-market” mortgage might be one way to put a floor on home-price declines. Why not give those in or facing foreclosure a haircut on principal? About 20 percent would be fair, reflecting the national decrease in house prices.  And, what about the diligent souls who have been paying their mortgages all along? Lower mortgage rates reflecting the Federal Reserve’s cost of funds -- about 1 percent, plus 2 percentage points of profit for the lenders -- would be beneficial. That may boost new-home sales, re-sales and refinancing. A strong new mortgage law could limit write-downs before a foreclosure hits the overcrowded court system. To avoid abuse, mark-to-market would be used as a last resort only; after all other options are exhausted. In its current form, though, the Obama mortgage bailout relies mostly on voluntary interest-rate modifications for relief through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-seized mortgage companies. Designed to keep people in their homes; the plan calls for reducing rates so that monthly payments are eventually no more than 31 percent of household income. The plan has shortfalls; if Congress sanctions mortgage write-downs or “cram-downs” in bankruptcy court each judge may be allowed to forgive as much principal as deemed appropriate. Even if a homeowner avoids bankruptcy and heads straight to foreclosure, a bank that repossesses the home can lose 40 percent or more in fees, commissions and discounting when the lender finally resells it. Marking down 20 percent in principal would be a relative bargain. That is where a write down cap would come in. Index it to local real-estate prices. When there is a recession, you are more likely to get a break. If you have positive equity, it is unlikely you will write it down. Mandatory Counseling: combine the write down and bankruptcy provisions with mandatory counseling and screening. That might stem future defaults, which have been occurring in 57 percent of Fannie’s and Freddie’s loan modifications. Everyone has a stake in a sensible solution to the crisis. If your neighbor’s home goes into foreclosure, it will depress your property value and often lead to an increase in crime. The whirlpool of defaults also contributes to lower consumer spending, constricted bank lending and even lower home prices, which dipped almost 19 percent in December.  Hard times require bold systemic changes!

by John F. Wasik of Bloomberg

The Obama administration, which says it doesn’t want to nationalize U.S. banks, may find itself taking another step in that direction if it converts the governments preferred shares in Citigroup Inc. into common equity to help the firm withstand losses.  Citigroup and rival Bank of America Corp are among more than 20 lenders that could wind up majority-owned by the government if such conversions took place.  U.S. regulators led by the Treasury Department announced today that the government stands ready to take bigger bank stakes in the form of shares that would be converted only as needed over time.  Some analysts already believe nationalization of some of the nation’s largest lenders appears to be well under way since the government already holds $52 billion of preferred shares in Citigroup, five times the bank’s market value as of Feb. 20.  The problem is that the government is dancing around this nationalization issue. They do not want to do it.  Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said in a Feb. 20 interview with Bloomberg Television that “short- term” government takeovers may be unavoidable.  Nationalization may be the only way out, since losses are just going to keep accelerate in the next couple of quarters. The holes in these banks are just too big.  Since the majority of outside financial investors are way too leery of buying bad mortgage notes and possibly getting stuck with them; a U.S. Government nationalize bank whose primary purpose is to buy up those bad mortgages, (freeing lending institutions to start lending again here in Las Vegas and other hard hit areas of our nation), and hold, manage and gradually liquidate them may be the only answer to this crisis.

By Linda Shen

Preventing foreclosures is critical for the nation’s economic recovery, and the Obama administration’s plan to help millions of homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes is a vitally important piece of legislation needed to help our nation get back up and running.  When people lose homes to foreclosure, our communities, the housing market and our economy all suffer. The administration’s proposed plan, combined with provisions like the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit in the just-enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, will help minimize foreclosures, shrink housing inventory, stabilize home values and move the country closer to an economic recovery.  Under another element of the program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will help make monthly payments more affordable for 4 to 5 million homeowners by refinancing mortgages with loans that these entities own or guarantee. The plan provides more fiscal support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which will in turn help keep mortgage rates low for all buyers and could lead to even lower rates.  President Obama’s $75 billion Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan would help struggling homeowners by providing incentives to lenders, loan servicers, mortgage holders and borrowers to help modify existing mortgage loans. The U.S. Treasury Department will be issuing uniform guidelines in two weeks and I’ll be bringing you an easy understanding of these guidelines as they pertain to our Las Vegas valley.

The days of undertaking quick-fix remodels to sell a home more quickly and for more money are long gone. Now, with loans hard to come by and home sales slow, remodeling is all about projects that save you money in the long term and pay you cash up front.  Believe it or not, the federal government is more than willing to help--to the tune of thousands in tax credits. But this isn't about redoing your kitchen; it's about energy independence.  To help keep people in their mortgages rather than letting a home go, many legislators--including House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank and the National Association of Realtors--have floated the idea of mortgage-rate buy-downs as an attempt to keep people in their homes and encourage home buying while helping curb our buildings effects on Climate Change.   One possible suggestion is to combine the two ideas of energy savings and tax incentives: Allow government assisted mortgage-rate buy-downs, if homeowners improve their energy efficiency by 75%.  Homeowners would get the benefit of a lower home payment and a tax deduction to boot and the targeted government money becomes directly invested into sustainable green projects that could spur our economy and help address our climate crisis.  It would incentive homeowners to invest money into improving the efficiency of their home for tax credit.  And what could be better than the combination of lower mortgage payments and smaller energy costs; especially when you throw in a few thousand dollars from Uncle Sam.  Now there’s a green idea!